THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMON EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK OF REFERENCE (CEFR) IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING AT SMPIT ZAIN AL-MUTTAQIN PALEMBANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/p76rap73Keywords:
Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), CEFR Implementation, English Language Teaching, Merdeka Curriculum, Student-Centered Learning.Abstract
This study aims to explore the implementation of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) standard in English language teaching at SMPIT Zain Al-Muttaqin Palembang. A mixed-method case study approach was employed to investigate the implementation of CEFR and capture the perspectives and experiences of the research participants in their natural setting. Data were collected through classroom observations, in-depth interviews with one English teacher, curriculum document analysis (lesson plans/teaching modules), and questionnaires distributed to 66 students across grades 7, 8, and 9. The results indicate that the CEFR implementation has been carried out well and systematically. CEFR was integrated into English language teaching through lesson planning, classroom instruction, learning materials, and assessment practices. The teacher applied differentiated instruction and communicative learning activities to accommodate students with different English proficiency levels while maintaining the same learning objectives. The teacher also perceived CEFR positively because it provided clear learning objectives and supported students' confidence and participation. Furthermore, the questionnaire results showed that most students had positive perceptions of CEFR-based learning, reporting that they understood the learning objectives, actively participated in classroom activities, and felt more motivated to learn English. Overall, the implementation of CEFR contributed to a more structured and student-centered English learning environment.In conclusion, the integration ofCEFR with the Merdeka Curriculum has successfully created a structured, inclusive, communicative, and student-centered learning environment.
References
Arifudin Abi Maryo, F. (2021). The issues of the implementation of CEFR in Indonesia. Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, 5(5), 12–25.
Astrianingsih, L., & Dwinalida, K. (2024). The implementation of curriculum based on CEFR in English teaching. Tarling: Journal of Language Education, 8(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.24090/tarling.v8i1.10621
Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan. (2024). Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Nomor 032/H/KR/2024 tentang capaian pembelajaran pada pendidikan anak usia dini, jenjang pendidikan dasar, dan jenjang pendidikan menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Continuum.
Carter, E. (2024, October 11). What is CEFR and what is it used for? Global English Test. https://globalenglishtest.com/what-is-cefr-and-what-is-it-used-for/
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment—Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages
Council of Europe. (2024). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment—Companion volume with International Sign Language translation. Council of Europe.
Council of Europe. (2025a). Classroom assessment: Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Council of Europe.
Council of Europe. (2025b). The CEFR in the classroom. Council of Europe.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Damayanti, I. L., Febrianti, Y., Suharto, P. P., Nurlaelawati, I., & Fellani, A. J. (2022). Buku panduan guru: English for Nusantara untuk SMP/MTs kelas IX. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Routledge.
EFL Cafe. (2023). Common teaching methods used by English teachers. https://eflcafe.net/common-teaching-methods-used-by-english-teachers/
Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Euroexam. (2023). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). https://www.euroexam.org/en/partners/common-european-framework
Figueras, N., & Munro, M. (2021). CEFR and cultural context challenges: Eurocentrism in language assessment.
Fulcher, G. (2004). Deluded by artifices? The Common European Framework and harmonization. Language Testing.
Ghanem, R. (2017). Classroom implementation of the CEFR: Teacher beliefs and practices. Journal of Language Teaching, 50(3), 45–58.
Hattie, J., & Donoghue, G. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. npj Science of Learning, 1(1), Article 16013. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13
Hui, S. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2023). ESL primary teachers’ perceptions on the use of communicative language teaching (CLT) approach to teach CEFR speaking skill. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 12(1).
Huhta, A. (2025). Common European Framework of Reference. In The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1157.pub2
Hulstijn, J. H. (2015). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) and its implications for language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(3), 427–440.
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2025a). Pengembangan kompetensi guru Bahasa Inggris pada satuan pendidikan jenjang pendidikan dasar dan pendidikan menengah.
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2025b, September 20). Ribuan guru SD akan mengikuti program pilot uji kemahiran Bahasa Inggris.
Kohler, A. (2015). Teacher perceptions of the CEFR in practice. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 1–21.
Kurniawan, I. W. A. (2024). English language and its importance as global communication. International Journal of Social Studies, 2(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.25078/ijoss.v2i1.3920
Little, D. (2006). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Content, purpose, origin, reception and impact. Cambridge University Press.
Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy and the CEFR. Council of Europe.
Little, D. (2016). Learner autonomy and the CEFR: The role of self-assessment in language learning. Council of Europe Publishing. https://www.coe.int/en/web/language-policy/cefr
Makwana, V. (2021). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR): Implications for language testing. Journal of English Language Teaching, 63(3).
Marzaini, A. F. M., Sharil, W. N. E. H., Supramaniam, K., & Yusoff, S. M. (2025). The enactment of teachers’ professional development in the implementation of CEFR-aligned classroom-based assessment: A case study in Malaysian schools. EDUCATUM Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.37134/ejoss.vol11.2.3.2025
McGrath, I. (2013). Teaching materials and the roles of EFL/ESL teachers: Practice and theory. Bloomsbury.
Morrow, K. (2004). Insights from the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) for materials design. ELT Journal, 58(3), 218–227.
Mualim, M. (2025). Common European Framework for Languages (CEFR) for global recognition: Its adoption feasibility in Indonesia. Conference on English Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.24090/celti.2025.1422
Novawan, A., Rahmawati, L., & Santosa, D. (2023). Reflecting on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) in the Indonesian context. JEAPCO: Journal of English Applied and Pedagogical Studies, 5(1), 12–28. https://publikasi.polije.ac.id/jeapco/article/view/3754
O'Dwyer, F. (2014). Using the CEFR in language teaching: Implications for classroom practice. Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 123–135.
Pertiwi, K. E. (2021). Efektifitas pendekatan differentiated instruction dalam proses pembelajaran. Ta’lim, 3(2), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.36269/tlm.v3i2.474
Piccardo, E., & North, B. (2019). The CEFR and language teaching: Learning-oriented approaches. Cambridge University Press.
Putri, A. I. (2023). An analysis of quality of reading tasks in English textbook for senior high school grade XII by Kemendikbud refers to CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference for Languages) criteria [Undergraduate thesis, UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta]. UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta Repository.
Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design.
Robbani, A. S., Nurdianto, T., Annafiri, A. Z., Haqqy, A. M., & Irfan. (2023). Tren penelitian dan tantangan penerapan Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) di junior high school of Palembang. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 6(4), 1011–1026.
Sudaryanto, & Widodo, P. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) dan implikasinya bagi buku ajar BIPA. Jurnal Idiomatik, 3(2), 80–87.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sukri, S. I. A., Zubairi, A. M., Saad, M. A., & Preece, A. S. D. (2025). CEFR implementation at the post-secondary level: Teachers’ receptivity. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.22452/juku.vol13no1.5
Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L. K. (2016). Extramural English and the CEFR. Palgrave Macmillan.
Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2013). Developing materials for language teaching (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury.
Ushioda, E. (2014). Motivation and classroom processes. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Putri Pitaloka, Tahrun Tahrun, Aswadi Jaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
