Analisis Pseudo-Thinking dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Berbasis Etnomatematika Pada Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v8i1.18068Keywords:
Pseudo Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognitive StyleAbstract
The research to find out and describe the results of the pseudo-thinking process in solving ethnomathematics-based mathematical problems in students in terms of cognitive style. The methods used in this study are qualitative descriptive. The subjects of this research were junior high school students from each field independent and field dependent cognitive style. The total number of respondents was 4 students. Data collection techniques using test mathematics problem solving based on ethnomathematics, interviews, and documentations. Based on the research result, it was found that 1) two students who classified field independent cognitive style are experiencing pseudo right or pseudo false and 2) two students who classified field dependent cognitive style are experiencing pseudo right or pseudo false.
References
Adhitya, Y., & Prabawanto, S. (2019). Characteristics of seventh grade students’ pseudo thinking in solving mathematical reasoning about number operation based on mindset. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042094
Appulembang, O. D., & Tamba, K. P. (2021). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Bergaya Kognitif Impulsif Berdasarkan Taksonomi Solo. Journal of Honai Math, 4(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v4i2.176
Azizah, R. N., & Abadi, A. P. (2022). Kajian Pustaka: Resiliensi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Didactical Mathematics, 4(1), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v4i1.2061
Cahdriyana, R. A., Richardo, R., Fahmi, S., & Setyawan, F. (2019). Pseudo-thinking process in solving logic problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012090
Efendi, J. F., & Pratama, R. A. (2020). Defragmenting Proses Berpikir Pseudo Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3), 651. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i3.2956
Hasan, B. (2020). Proses Kognitif Siswa Field Independent dan Field Dependent dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 3(4), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v3i4.323-332
Indri, H. Y., & Widiyastuti, E. (2018). Analisis Berpikir Pseudo Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. AlphaMath : Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.30595/alphamath.v4i2.7634
Kusmaryono, I., Ubaidah, N., & Basir, M. A. (2020). the Role of Scaffolding in the Deconstructing of Thinking Structure: a Case Study of Pseudo-Thinking Process. Infinity Journal, 9(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i2.p247-262
Kusuma, D. A., Suryadi, D., & Dahlan, J. A. (2019). Improving external mathematical connections and students’ activity using ethnomathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032120
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. International Educational and Professional Publisher (Kedua). London: Sage Publications.
Muslim, R. I., Usodo, B., & Pratiwi, H. (2021). Pseudo Thinking Process in Understanding the Concept of Exponential Equations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1808(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012043
Polya, G. (1985). How to Solve it. Princenton University Press (2nd ed.). Princenton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511616747.007
Puspita, D., & Amalia, R. (2020). Koordinasi Bimbingan Konseling dengan Guru Bidang Studi Menghadapi Siswa Berkesulitan Belajar Matematika. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN Dan KONSELING, 2(2), 1–7.
Raharjo, J. F. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif (Field Dependent atau Field Indepenpent) dalam Masalah Literasi Numerasi. In Prisma (Vol. 7, pp. 624–647). Retrieved from https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/prisma
Riyani, P., & Hadi, M. S. (2023). Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses. Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, 7(1), 16–27.
Riyantika, E., Muniri, & Maryono. (2023). Restructuring of Pseudo-Thinking Processes in Solving Mathematical Problems Investigated from Reflective and Impulsive Cognitive Style. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara, 6(1), 94–103. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/53a3/ac678350d15ea7def07f876d1c09d54add6c.pdf
Rosa, M., D’Ambrosio, U., Shirley, L., V. Alangui, W., Palhares, P., & Gavarrete, M. E. (2016). Current and Future Perspectives of Ethnomathematics as a Program. ICME-13 Topical Surveys. Hamburg, Germany. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/series/14352
Salsabila, & Azhar, E. (2022). Analisis Kesalahan Berpikir Pseudo dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau dari Self Confidence. UNION: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 239–252.
Sartika, H. Y., Sastrawati, E., & Budiono, H. (2024). Eksplorasi Etnomatematika Motif Rumah, 10(1), 228–238.
Subanji. (2011). Teori Berpikir Pseudo Penalaran Kovariasional (1st ed.). Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang (UM PRESS).
Subanji. (2013). Proses berpikir pseudo siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah proporsi. J-Teqip, 4(2), 207–226.
Subanji, S., & Nusantara, T. (2016). Thinking Process of Pseudo Construction in Mathematics Concepts. International Education Studies, 9(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n2p17
Syahraini, A., Priatna, N., & Suhendra, S. (2023). Students’ Pseudo-Thinking Process in Solving SPLDV Problems Based on Polya’s Stages. Jurnal Analisa, 9(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v9i1.26543
Vinner, S. (1997). The Pseudo-Conceptual and the Pseudo-Analytical Thought Processes in Mathematics Learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, Conference Series, 1157(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032120
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. International Educational and Professional Publisher (Kedua). London: Sage Publications.
Muslim, R. I., Usodo, B., & Pratiwi, H. (2021). Pseudo Thinking Process in Understanding the Concept of Exponential Equations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1808(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012043
Polya, G. (1985). How to Solve it. Princenton University Press (2nd ed.). Princenton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511616747.007
Puspita, D., & Amalia, R. (2020). Koordinasi Bimbingan Konseling dengan Guru Bidang Studi Menghadapi Siswa Berkesulitan Belajar Matematika. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN Dan KONSELING, 2(2), 1–7.
Raharjo, J. F. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif (Field Dependent atau Field Indepenpent) dalam Masalah Literasi Numerasi. In Prisma (Vol. 7, pp. 624–647). Retrieved from https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/prisma
Riyani, P., & Hadi, M. S. (2023). Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses. Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, 7(1), 16–27.
Riyantika, E., Muniri, & Maryono. (2023). Restructuring of Pseudo-Thinking Processes in Solving Mathematical Problems Investigated from Reflective and Impulsive Cognitive Style. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara, 6(1), 94–103. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/53a3/ac678350d15ea7def07f876d1c09d54add6c.pdf
Rosa, M., D’Ambrosio, U., Shirley, L., V. Alangui, W., Palhares, P., & Gavarrete, M. E. (2016). Current and Future Perspectives of Ethnomathematics as a Program. ICME-13 Topical Surveys. Hamburg, Germany. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/series/14352
Salsabila, & Azhar, E. (2022). Analisis Kesalahan Berpikir Pseudo dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau dari Self Confidence. UNION: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 239–252.
Sartika, H. Y., Sastrawati, E., & Budiono, H. (2024). Eksplorasi Etnomatematika Motif Rumah, 10(1), 228–238.
Subanji. (2011). Teori Berpikir Pseudo Penalaran Kovariasional (1st ed.). Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang (UM PRESS).
Subanji. (2013). Proses berpikir pseudo siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah proporsi. J-Teqip, 4(2), 207–226.
Subanji, S., & Nusantara, T. (2016). Thinking Process of Pseudo Construction in Mathematics Concepts. International Education Studies, 9(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n2p17
Syahraini, A., Priatna, N., & Suhendra, S. (2023). Students’ Pseudo-Thinking Process in Solving SPLDV Problems Based on Polya’s Stages. Jurnal Analisa, 9(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v9i1.26543
Vinner, S. (1997). The Pseudo-Conceptual and the Pseudo-Analytical Thought Processes in Mathematics Learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34,97–129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A
Wahyuni, Zaiyar, M., Mazlan, M., Saragih, S., & Napitupulu, E. (2023). Students talk about difficulties they have in solving math problems. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v14i1.16910
Wibawa, K. A. (2016). Defragmenting Struktur Berpikir Pseudo Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. Sleman: Deepublish.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0034-6543(197724)47:1%3C1:FAFCSA%3E2.0.CO;2-R
Wulandari, Y., Rahmawati, A. E., Handriani, S. Z., Setyaningsih, A. A., Baidowi, A. L., & Darmadi, D. (2020). Penerapan Dan Pemahaman Siswa Smp Kelas Viii Terhadap Materi Pembelajaran Matematika Dalam Kehidupan. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 4(1), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v4i1.1819
Zaini, Z. (2021). Mathematical Reasoning Abilities of Students in Terms of Field Dependence (Fd) Cognitive Style in Problem-Solving. Multica Science and Technology (Mst), 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.47002/mst.v1i1.198
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Devia Meisya Badar, Kamid, Khairul Anwar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
