Peer Review

All manuscripts submitted to this journal undergo a peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and relevance of the published articles. Each manuscript is first evaluated by the editorial team to determine its suitability in terms of scope, format, and basic academic standards.

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening will be sent to reviewers who are experts in the relevant field. The journal applies a double-blind peer review process, in which both the authors and the reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process.

Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on originality, clarity, methodology, significance of the findings, and contribution to the field. Based on the reviewers’ comments and recommendations, the editor will make one of the following decisions:

• accepted without revision,
• accepted with minor revisions,
• accepted with major revisions, or
• rejected.

Authors are required to revise their manuscripts in accordance with the reviewers’ and editors’ comments. The final decision on manuscript acceptance is made by the editorial board.