Profil Tingkat Resiliensi Siswa Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin Serta Implikasinya dalam Pelayanan Bimbingan dan Konseling

Authors

  • Vasco Delano Universitas Mathla'ul Anwar
  • Eneng Sinta Dewi Universitas Mathla’ul Anwar Banten
  • Hernindya Septarinjani Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Annisa Arrumaisyah Daulay Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31851/juang.v8i1.19544

Keywords:

Resilience, gender, guidance and counseling

Abstract

This study aims to describe the level of student resilience in terms of gender and its implications in guidance and counseling services. The study used a quantitative approach with a descriptive-comparative method. The study population was students of SMAN 3 Padang City and SMAN 3 Mukomuko with a sample size of 278 students, consisting of 121 males and 157 females selected through proportional random sampling techniques. The research instrument was a resilience scale that had been tested for validity and reliability. The results showed that in general the level of resilience of male students was higher than that of females, with an average resilience score of male students of 70.95% and females of 69.10%, both in the high category. Significant differences were found in the sub-variables of optimism and emotional regulation. These findings indicate that gender is a factor that influences students' ability to deal with post-disaster stress and trauma. The implications of these results direct BK teachers to design gender-responsive guidance services in order to maintain and improve students' psychological resilience in schools.

References

Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2006). Sadness, anger, and frustration: Gendered patterns in early adolescents’ and their parents’ emotion talk. Sex Roles, 55(11-12), 775-785.

Barends, M. S. (2004). Overcoming adversity: An investigation of the role of resilience constructs in the relationship between socioeconomic and demographic factors and academic coping.

Bonanno, G. A., Galea, S., Bucciarelli, A., & Vlahov, D. (2007). What predicts psychological resilience after disaster? The role of demographics, resources, and life stress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(5), 671-682.

Calhoun, J. F., & Acocella, J. R. (1990). Psychology of adjustment and human relationship. McGraw-Hill Publishing.

Eisenberg, N., Valiente, C., Fabes, A. R., Smith, L. C., Reiser, M., Shepard, A. S., Losoya, H. S., Guthrie, K. I., Murphy, C. B., & Cumberland, J. A. (2003). The reaction of effortful control and ego control to children’s resilience and social functioning. Developmental Psychology, 39, 761-776.

Grotberg, E. H. (1999). Tapping your inner strength. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc.

Ifdil, I., Ardi, Z., & Yendi, F. M. (2012). Resilience post-disaster of students SMA Negeri in Padang. Jurnal Konselor, 1(1).

Karanci, N. A., Alkan, N., Aksit, B., Sucuoglo, H., & Balta, E. (1999). Gender differences in psychological distress, coping, social support, and related variables following the 1995 Dinar (Turkey) earthquake. North America: Journal of Psychology, 189-204.

Mudjiran, & Daharnis. (2010). Pemulihan dini mental masyarakat pasca gempa di Kota Padang. Padang: Pemko Padang, BNPB, UNP.

Natawidjaja, D. H. (2007). Gempabumi dan tsunami di Sumatra dan upaya untuk mengembangkan lingkungan hidup yang aman dari bencana alam. Laporan KHL, LIPI. Jakarta.

Reivich, K., & Shatte, A. (2002). The resilience factor: 7 keys to finding your inner strength and overcoming life’s hurdles. Pennsylvania: Three Rivers Press.

Sudirman, S., Daharnis, D., & Marjohan, M. (2013). Peran guru bimbingan dan konseling serta peran guru mata pelajaran dalam mengatasi kesulitan belajar siswa di sekolah menengah atas (SMA) negeri. Konselor, 2(1).

Vijaykumar, L., Thara, R., John, S., & Chellappa, S. (2006). Psychological interventions after tsunami in Tamil Nadu, India. International Review of Psychiatry, 18(3), 225-231.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-12

How to Cite

Profil Tingkat Resiliensi Siswa Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin Serta Implikasinya dalam Pelayanan Bimbingan dan Konseling. (2025). Jurnal Wahana Konseling, 8(1), 122-130. https://doi.org/10.31851/juang.v8i1.19544