Analysis of Learning Behavior, Persistence, and Conceptual Understanding of Students with Hearing Impairments in Visual Learning at Manunggal Special School, Slawi

Authors

  • Abdurrohman Najat Program Studi Bimbingan dan Konseling Pendidikan Islam, Institut Agama Islam Bakti Negara
  • Adinda Riski Sabila Program Studi Bimbingan dan Konseling Pendidikan Islam, Institut Agama Islam Bakti Negara
  • Efvelin BS Program Studi Bimbingan dan Konseling Pendidikan Islam, Institut Agama Islam Bakti Negara
  • Aghus M Sabda Jaya Program Studi Bimbingan dan Konseling Pendidikan Islam, Institut Agama Islam Bakti Negara
  • Amanda Fitriyani Program Studi Bimbingan dan Konseling Pendidikan Islam, Institut Agama Islam Bakti Negara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31851/7wcq6g08

Keywords:

hearing impairment; visual learning; learning behavior; persistence; conceptual understanding

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the learning behavior, persistence, and conceptual understanding of Grade VI students with hearing impairments in visual learning at Manunggal Special School, Slawi. A descriptive qualitative design with a case study orientation was employed. Participants consisted of one classroom teacher and six students with hearing impairments selected purposively. Data were collected through classroom observation, visual worksheet analysis, field notes, and teacher confirmation. The observation focused on learning focus, visual response, conceptual understanding, independence, and persistence, using a four-point scoring scale. The findings showed that students obtained high scores ranging from 3 to 4 across most observed indicators, indicating good to very good engagement. Visual learning supported students’ ability to follow instructions, recognize images, match pictures with concepts, complete simple arithmetic tasks, and persist in completing worksheets despite communication barriers. The teacher’s use of pictures, demonstrations, sign language, facial expressions, and concrete examples helped transform verbal concepts into accessible visual information. The study concludes that visual learning functions as pedagogical accessibility for students with hearing impairments. It supports not only conceptual understanding but also learning persistence and independence. These findings highlight the importance of structured visual media and empathetic teacher communication in special education classrooms more meaningfully.

References

Atika, Iva, Himawan Putranta, Norimune Kawai, Masashi Hayashida, and Akira Shinkai. 2023. “Science Education Practices for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students in Indonesia.” Specijalna Edukacija i Rehabilitacija 22(3):201–20. doi:10.5937/specedreh22-41397.

Crowe, Sarah, Kathrin Cresswell, Ann Robertson, Guro Huby, Anthony Avery, and Aziz Sheikh. 2011. “The Case Study Approach.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 11(1):100. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-100.

Ediyanto, Ediyanto, Areej Talea Almutairi, Muchamad Irvan, and Sinta Yuni Susilawati. 2023. “Learning Instruments in Science for Students with Hearing Impairment: A Literature Review.” P. 110001 in.

Finton, Erin, Wyatte C. Hall, Michele Berke, Ronald Bye, Stuart Ikeda, and Naomi Caselli. 2025. “Age-Expected Language and Academic Outcomes for Deaf Children With Hearing Caregivers.” The Journal of Special Education 58(4):232–43. doi:10.1177/00224669241257699.

Gehret, Austin U., and Lisa B. Elliot. 2025. “Perceptions of E-Learning by Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students Using Asynchronous Multimedia Tutorials.” Educational Technology Research and Development 73(3):1921–49. doi:10.1007/s11423-025-10476-z.

Hartman, Maria C., Elaine R. Smolen, and Brynne Powell. 2023. “Curriculum and Instruction for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students: Evidence from the Past—Considerations for the Future.” Education Sciences 13(6):533. doi:10.3390/educsci13060533.

Herring, Tina J., and M. Lynn Woolsey. 2020. “Three Suggested Teaching Strategies for Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.” Support for Learning 35(3):346–58. doi:10.1111/1467-9604.12314.

Korstjens, Irene, and Albine Moser. 2018. “Series: Practical Guidance to Qualitative Research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and Publishing.” European Journal of General Practice 24(1):120–24. doi:10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092.

Nassaji, Hossein. 2015. “Qualitative and Descriptive Research: Data Type versus Data Analysis.” Language Teaching Research 19(2):129–32. doi:10.1177/1362168815572747.

Nowell, Lorelli S., Jill M. Norris, Deborah E. White, and Nancy J. Moules. 2017. “Thematic Analysis.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1). doi:10.1177/1609406917733847.

Palinkas, Lawrence A., Sarah M. Horwitz, Carla A. Green, Jennifer P. Wisdom, Naihua Duan, and Kimberly Hoagwood. 2015. “Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.” Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 42(5):533–44. doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.

Santos, Stacee, and Sara Cordes. 2022. “Math Abilities in Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children: The Role of Language in Developing Number Concepts.” Psychological Review 129(1):199–211. doi:10.1037/rev0000303.

Silvestri, Julia A., and Maria C. Hartman. 2022. “Inclusion and Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students: Finding Asylum in the LRE.” Education Sciences 12(11):773. doi:10.3390/educsci12110773.

Tong, A., P. Sainsbury, and J. Craig. 2007. “Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32-Item Checklist for Interviews and Focus Groups.” International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19(6):349–57. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Analysis of Learning Behavior, Persistence, and Conceptual Understanding of Students with Hearing Impairments in Visual Learning at Manunggal Special School, Slawi. (2026). Jurnal Wahana Konseling, 9(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.31851/7wcq6g08